Connect with us
Advertisement

World

Fact Check: Mark Wahlberg’s $35,000 Donation to James Van Der Beek’s Family Debunked

A viral social media claim alleged that Mark Wahlberg donated $35,000 to James Van Der Beek’s GoFundMe fundraiser. However, there is no evidence supporting the claim, and Wahlberg’s name does not appear on the official donor list. The rumour appears to have originated from an unreliable Facebook post.

Published

on

Fact Check: Mark Wahlberg’s $35,000 Donation to James Van Der Beek’s Family Debunked
Summarise This Article With

In the last few days, a viral claim was circulating on social media platforms that Family Plan actor Mark Wahlberg had contributed $35,000 to James Van Der Beek’s family via GoFundMe.

The rumour spread along with reports of contributions from notable Hollywood personalities such as Steven Spielberg, Jon M. Chu, Guy Oseary, and Zoe Saldaña.

The fundraiser was created after the demise of Van Der Beek, who had been battling third-stage colorectal cancer since 2023.

However, the claims made on social media are false, and there is no evidence that Mark Wahlberg had contributed $35,000 to James Van Der Beek’s family via GoFundMe.

This was confirmed by Mark Wahlberg and James Van Der Beek’s families.

Wahlberg’s name also does not appear in the donors’ list on the GoFundMe page.

Advertisement

The fundraiser has raised over $2 million with confirmed contributions from Spielberg, Chu, Oseary, and Saldana.

The genesis of the rumour can be traced to a post on the social media platform Facebook by a user named Dreamy Dube from Dorchester, who first made the claim.

The post even stated that James Van Der Beek’s family was moved to tears by the gesture from Mark Wahlberg. There was even a mention of Van Der Beek’s widow in the post.

Media outlet Primetimer, in a report, stated that the post was from an unreliable site that has in the past been indicted for fake AI-generated articles.

However, the GoFundMe campaign has evoked strong support and has already raised $2.6 million in a few days. There has been an outpouring of prayers and condolences.

However, Wahlberg is well known for his philanthropy and had donated the money he received for the reshoots of All the Money in the World, which totalled $1.5 million.

Advertisement

The actor had donated the whole amount for Time’s Up legal defence fund, an initiative supporting victims of sexual misconduct.

The donations also highlight Wahlberg’s pledge to address workplace inequality.

Also Read: What Is JeffTube? DOJ’s Jeffrey Epstein File Release Spurs YouTube-Like Platform to Organize 3.5 Million Pages

Advertisement
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

World

Texas Woman Carmen Mejia Freed After 22 Years as Court Overturns Wrongful Conviction in Infant Scalding Case

Carmen Mejia was freed after spending more than two decades in prison for the 2003 scalding death of a child in her care. A Innocence Project review uncovered new testimony and scientific evidence, leading a Texas court to overturn her conviction.

Published

on

Texas Woman Carmen Mejia Freed After 22 Years as Court Overturns Wrongful Conviction in Infant Scalding Case
Summarise This Article With

An Austin woman was wrongfully sentenced to life imprisonment in 2003 on charges of the scalding death of a child in her care.

Carmen Mejia walked out of prison after more than twenty years, after new testimony and scientific evidence led the courts to contend that she was wrongfully convicted in the tragic death of a baby, which was then considered to have been deliberately scalded.

The Austin woman, who is also a mother of four, had for the last 22 years maintained that the tragic death of the child was a devastating accident and not a crime.

The conviction was overturned after new scientific evidence and testimony were placed before the court.

The mother of four was acquitted on 9 March 2026 by a Texas court, declaring her innocent of a crime that had devastated her life.

Advertisement

The genesis of the case can be traced to 28 July 2003, when Carmen Mejia, who was the nanny of a 10-month-old boy while also taking care of her four children at her Austin home, accidentally scalded the child in a bathtub.

According to the evidence presented before the court, the child suffered extensive burns after being exposed to hot bathwater in the rented apartment.

Further investigation found the water heater was not equipped with safety features that would have prevented the bath water from reaching extremely high temperatures.

Evidence presented before the court revealed that the bathwater temperatures had reached 65 degrees centigrade, which was hot enough to precipitate third-degree burns.

The infant was later rushed to a medical facility but succumbed to complications caused by extensive burns. Prosecutors alleged that Carmen Mejia had deliberately submerged the child in scalding water and delayed seeking medical help.

She was convicted of murder and injury and sentenced to life imprisonment.

Advertisement

Years later, the case was again opened for scrutiny under the Innocence Project and uncovered new testimony. A key testimony which turned the case in Carmen Mejia’s favour was that of her daughter, who was three years old when the tragedy happened.

As an adult, she testified that she had turned the faucet on the bathtub when the baby was inside. She further stated that her mother was not in the bathroom then.

Investigators also uncovered serious lapses in the original prosecution.

It found that the jury never heard video-recorded interviews in which Carmen Mejia’s daughters reinforced their mother’s story about the accident. Years later, after the conviction, burn experts stated that the burns were consistent with those due to accidental scalding rather than intentional harm.

All this new evidence led the Texas Court to overturn the conviction and let Carmen walk free from her prison cell.

Also Read: Donald Trump Urges Jake Paul to Run for Office, Promises ‘Complete and Total Endorsement’

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Donald Trump Urges Jake Paul to Run for Office, Promises ‘Complete and Total Endorsement’

Jake Paul sparked political speculation after appearing alongside Donald Trump at a rally in Hebron, Kentucky. Trump publicly suggested Paul should run for political office and promised his endorsement, igniting widespread debate online about the influencer’s possible political future.

Published

on

Donald Trump Urges Jake Paul to Run for Office, Promises ‘Complete and Total Endorsement'
Summarise This Article With

Is Jake Paul finally joining politics? Has his political journey been green-flagged by US President Donald Trump? Read on to know more about this developing story.

Interestingly, Jake Paul is not a registered Republican, and it is unclear if he is eligible to vote in US presidential elections from Puerto Rico.

However, it is common knowledge that he supported President Trump in 2024. Jake Paul, a streamer who later turned boxer, joined hands with US President Donald Trump on stage at an event in Hebron, Kentucky.

He is a well-known name in the wrestling circuit and often hosts high-profile bouts under his banner. It was in this rally that Trump hinted that Paul would soon venture into politics.

The venue of the event was the Verst Logistics Contract Packaging Facility in Hebron. Trump went on into a blistering attack on US House Representative Thomas Massie, a vehement Trump critic. Later, he ushered Jake Paul onto the stage and asked him to run for a political office in the US and also promised to endorse him if he did so.

Advertisement

This sparked a huge debate in social media circles, and answers were sought as to whether he was a registered Republican voter and if he endorsed President Trump’s electoral campaign of 2023.

However, the boxer has mostly lived in Puerto Rico since 2021. He was originally from Westlake, Ohio, and it is unclear if he can vote in the US presidential elections. He, however, was a staunch supporter of President Donald Trump and even voiced his support in the 2024 campaign of Trump for the US presidential polls.

He cited economy, borders, and free speech as the reasons for his support for Trump. After Trump’s victory, he hailed it as a win for truth and God and attended the inauguration of the Trump administration with his brother Logan.

Trump made a prediction about Jake Paul and stated,

“I’m going to make a prediction that you will be, in the not-too-distant future, running for political office,” the 79-year-old said. “You have my complete and total endorsement.”

Paul later took the mic and stated.

Advertisement

“What Mr. Trump has taught me is courage. We never back down from a fight, even if they’re much bigger than you, much, much bigger than you. I feel all the local Kentuckians feel the same way. You guys have that fight. You guys have that swag.”

Also Read: 12-Foot Gold Donald Trump – Jeffrey Epstein ‘Titanic Pose’ Statue Appears at National Mall

Continue Reading

World

12-Foot Gold Donald Trump – Jeffrey Epstein ‘Titanic Pose’ Statue Appears at National Mall, Ignites Social Media Debate

A satirical statue depicting Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein in a Titanic-inspired pose briefly appeared on the National Mall. The gold-painted installation sparked intense debate online before authorities removed the controversial protest artwork.

Published

on

12-Foot Gold Donald Trump – Jeffrey Epstein ‘Titanic Pose’ Statue Appears at National Mall, Ignites Social Media Debate
Summarise This Article With

Widespread media and public attention were drawn when an unknown artist mounted a gold, Titanic-inspired statuette of US President Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein on the National Mall in Washington, DC.

It was satire at its best when the protest art came up at the National Mall, and the artist took a cue from the famous pose by Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet in the film “Titanic.”

The statue has sparked intense debate and discussion on social media platforms.

Soon, the clips of the erection of the statue on Tuesday morning began going viral on social media.

The statue is 12 feet in height and is coated with gold-colored paint.

Advertisement

In the statue, US President Donald Trump could be seen standing behind convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein while they are facing the Washington Monument.

The duo is seen in the same pose as the one given by Leonardo and Kate in front of the ill-fated ship.

It was a satirical take on the alleged friendship between Jeffrey Epstein and the US President and was also labelled with the title ‘Best Friends Forever.’

It is reported that the statue was erected by the Secret Handshake collective and has achieved its aim of starting a huge debate on the controversial relationship.

However, the statue was later removed, and it once again proved the fact that public art related to prominent political personalities is not digested easily.

Beneath the statue, a plaque was placed that read,

Advertisement

“The tragic love story between Jack and Rose was built on luxurious travel, raucous parties, and secret nude sketches. This monument honours the bond between Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, a friendship seemingly built on luxurious travel, raucous parties, and secret nude sketches.”

Ten banners were also placed, and every picture featured the duo together, and one banner repeated the Trump slogan during his election campaign of making America safe again.

One of the banners also featured the emblem of the United States Department of Justice, albeit without the word “Justice,” which was redacted.

The erection of the statue comes at a time when there is increased scrutiny of the relationship between Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein.

The debate gained traction after the release of the files related to the Jeffrey Epstein case.

Epstein was charged with running a child sex and prostitution ring and had committed suicide while awaiting trial in his cell.

Advertisement

Also Read: Viral Claims of “Katie Johnson” Arrest in Trump–Epstein Case Appear Unverified Online

Continue Reading

Trending

Google Preferred Source Badge