Connect with us
Advertisement

World

Mexico Police Viral Video: Intimate Act Car Sparks Outrage; SSC Launches Internal Probe Amid Mistaken Identity Claims

A viral video allegedly showing two Mexico City police officers engaging in inappropriate behavior inside a patrol car has sparked public outrage. While the officers’ identities remain undisclosed, an internal investigation is underway. Meanwhile, an unrelated female officer has denied involvement, urging the public to stop falsely linking her to the video.

Published

on

Mexico Police Viral Video: Intimate Act Car Sparks Outrage; SSC Launches Internal Probe Amid Mistaken Identity Claims
Summarise This Article With

A viral video, which allegedly depicts two officers from Mexico City’s Citizen Security Secretariat (SSC) in an inappropriate act in a patrol car, has triggered a huge uproar, with netizens questioning the morality that must be maintained, especially in the police force.

However, the identity of the police officers who are seen in the video is unknown, as is the location of the alleged incident.

Mexico Police Viral Video Sparks Outrage

Meanwhile, an officer from the SSC CDMX has denied in a post on Facebook that the woman in the video is her. She also stated that the woman in the video was wearing a blue uniform, while her uniform is black.

The woman also stated that she worked with the Metropolitan Police group, while the woman in the video allegedly works in another sector.

The viral video has led to uncomfortable questions, with many netizens deriding the police officers in the video for indulging in an inappropriate act in uniform and in a police vehicle. Even more disturbing is the fact that another unrelated police officer is being falsely linked to the viral video.

Advertisement

The police officer also shared a number of pictures of her posing with other police officers and appealed to netizens not to share images that use her face.

Many users have begun sharing images of the unrelated police officer without checking the veracity of the identity of the woman in the viral video. This has led to damage to the reputation of the innocent woman.

The Secretariat of Citizen Security has initiated an internal probe into the alleged viral video, and it is being conducted by the General Directorate of Internal Affairs.

The latter has also stated that the two police officers have been identified and will soon be summoned to testify before the agency.

The Secretariat of Citizen Security also stated that this kind of behaviour is not becoming of police officers, and the SSC remains committed to maintaining institutional integrity and professional conduct protocols.

The identities and the location of the officers who appear in the viral video have not been revealed in public. The agency has, however, stated that the erring officers will receive administrative sanctions and could also be dismissed from the force.

Advertisement

Also Read: Wendy Guevara’s Private Video Leaked; Goes Viral: She Says “They Did It to Kim Kardashian”

Advertisement
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

World

Did Galgotias University Pass Off a Unitree Robot as Its Own? AI Summit ‘Orion’ Demo Sparks Political Row After Rahul Gandhi’s Remarks

A controversy erupted at the AI Impact Summit after a viral video showed a Galgotias University professor presenting a robot dog named “Orion” as an in-house creation. Online users later identified the machine as a Unitree Robotics quadruped robot. The university issued a clarification following widespread backlash.

Published

on

Did Galgotias University Pass Off a Unitree Robot as Its Own? AI Summit ‘Orion’ Demo Sparks Political Row After Rahul Gandhi’s Remarks
Summarise This Article With

A huge controversy erupted after a video at the ongoing AI Impact Summit went viral on social media.

A Galgotias University professor, Neha Singh, claimed that the robot dog, named “Orion”, was created in-house by the institution’s Centre of Excellence.

However, netizens quickly found out that it was a Chinese robot dog that the university was claiming as its own.

In the video, Professor Neha Singh claimed that the robot dog was created by the university and was deployed to conduct surveillance and monitoring duties across the university campus.

However, the machine closely resembled a commercially accessible quadruped robot mass-produced by Unitree Robotics.

Advertisement

Online users severely criticised the university for falsification.

Later, after the backlash, Galgotias University issued a clarification and stated that it had never claimed that the robot dog on display was created in-house.

The university also added that it regularly obtained advanced technologies from different locations, including China, Singapore, and the United States, to give its students firsthand exposure to AI technologies.

The university also claimed that the robot was a tool that facilitated students to experiment, learn about its capabilities, and give them a better understanding of robotics and artificial intelligence.

Unitree Robotics mass produces four-limbed robots, which have been nicknamed “robodogs” and can mimic animal movements and are employed for a wide range of applications, such as hurdle navigation, industrial inspection, research applications, and entertainment.

Advertisement

The robodogs manufactured by the company are very popular across the world because they are reasonably priced and rub shoulders with Boston Dynamics’ quadruped robot, Spot.

The episode has also caused a political storm, with the leader of the opposition, Rahul Gandhi, labelling the AI summit a “disorganised PR spectacle”.

Gandhi also alleged that Chinese products have been showcased while the Indian data has been compromised and put on sale.

He also added that the present Modi government has made India a laughing stock globally.

Also Read: HMVs Banned on Western Express Highway on February 17 for PM Modi and Macron’s Visit

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Beech Grove Officer Brian Elliott Killed in Line of Duty While Responding to Domestic Disturbance; Suspect in Custody

Beech Grove police officer Brian Elliott was fatally shot while responding to a domestic disturbance near Indianapolis. The suspect, Kenneth Terrell Johnson, was later taken into custody by IMPD SWAT. Another officer injured in the incident is reported to be in stable condition.

Published

on

Beech Grove Officer Brian Elliott Killed in Line of Duty While Responding to Domestic Disturbance; Suspect in Custody
Summarise This Article With

A 33-year-old Beech Grove police officer, Brian Elliott, lost his life after he was shot when he was in the midst of a domestic disturbance that happened near Indianapolis.

The suspect involved in the shooting, Kenneth Terrell Johnson, fled the scene but was later apprehended by IMPD SWAT.

The ISP confirmed on Monday that the suspect who shot Officer Brian Elliot is now in custody.

According to media outlet WISH-TV, Brian Elliot was responding to a domestic disturbance at around 6:05 p.m. on Monday along with other police officers when he was shot by the suspect.

Another police officer whose name has not been revealed was also injured in the shooting. Both the police officers were rushed to the Eskenazi Hospital for emergency treatment, where Officer Elliot succumbed to his injuries.

Advertisement

The other police officer who was also injured in the shooting is reported to be in a stable condition and is expected to survive.

According to police officials, Officer Elliot had graduated from Beech Grove High School and had been serving with the Beech Grove Police since September 2024. He had earlier served for four years in the Marion County Sheriff’s Office.

The suspect fled the scene but was apprehended later. The demise of the police officer was confirmed by Beech Grove Police Chief Michael Maurice in a Facebook post.

The police chief stated,

“It is with a heavy heart that I inform you that today we lost one of our very own, Officer Brian Elliott.”

Expressing his deep condolences to Brian Elliot’s family, the police chief stated,

Advertisement

“My heart goes out to Brian’s wife, Erin, his parents, and all of his family, friends, and loved ones. At this time, I am asking that we lean on one another to get through this.”

The Chief also lauded the medical personnel at Eskenazi Hospital and said,

“We are grateful to the team at Eskenazi Hospital and our law enforcement and community partners for their extraordinary response and support.”

Continue Reading

World

Billboard Targeting James Charles Over Past Grooming Allegations Appears in Los Angeles

A billboard targeting YouTuber James Charles has appeared in Los Angeles, referencing past grooming allegations from 2021. Funded by Ethan Klein, the display highlights previous accusations and a BBC report, reigniting debate as Charles attempts to rebuild his career.

Published

on

Billboard Targeting James Charles Over Past Grooming Allegations Appears in Los Angeles
Summarise This Article With

YouTuber James Charles has been troubled by sexual impropriety and grooming allegations since 2021, and the episode has once again come to haunt him with a new billboard, which appeared on Saturday morning at the corner of Olympic Boulevard and Colby Avenue.

The billboard read,

“SAY, JAMES, I HEAR YOU TEXT EM YOUNG*,”

Along with the caption was featured a picture of the influencer.

It is reported that the billboard was funded by Ted Entertainment, which is co-owned by Ethan Klein, a comedian and podcaster.

For the unversed, Klein has been a vehement critic of Charles, who is trying to rebuild his career after the fallout of the bisexual impropriety and grooming allegations, for which he had also apologized.

Klein, in an Instagram post, had accepted that he was behind the billboard and also stated that it cost him $10,000.

However, what was worse is that the billboard also featured a search bar titled “James Charles Allegations” and quotes a BBC article titled “James Charles: YouTube star admits messaging 16-year-old boys,” dated April 2021.

James Charles had apologized for his actions in a Youtube video which has since been deleted.

Klein posted a video on his Instagram handle on Saturday and said,

“ThisYouTube video, is the only good idea I’ve had to try to do something. With somebody with resources and reach, I feel like it’s the least I can do to try to remind the people of Los Angeles and the world that this is what James Charles gets up to. It’s time we start calling him out, so I hope you’ll enjoy it—except you, James.”

Advertisement

James Charles was embroiled in a huge controversy in 2021 when two sixteen-year-old social media users, Isaiyah and Robert, alleged that Charles, who was 21 then, was involved in grooming and engaging in inappropriate and sexually explicit messaging.

Claims also started floating on social media platform TikTok about explicit Snapchat conversations and the exchange of sexually suggestive photos.

The influencer initially negated all the rumors and stated that he was under the assumption that the boys were above 18.

However, he subsequently released a 14-minute video in which he apologized for his actions and termed them as reckless.

He also acknowledged that he had engaged in sexually oriented conversation with the two minors.

Also Read: What Is JeffTube? DOJ’s Jeffrey Epstein File Release Spurs YouTube-Like Platform to Organize 3.5 Million Pages

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Google Preferred Source Badge